Light Mode
Dark Mode
System Mode
Wenger supports World Cup hydration breaks as FIFA pledges a comprehensive post-tournament review of player welfare and match protocols.
What happened, where, who said it, when and the main outcome: Arsène Wenger, Fifa’s head of global football development, said he accepts that mandatory three-minute hydration breaks used across World Cup matches in the United States, Mexico and Canada proved unpopular with some supporters and broadcasters, and that Fifa will analyse their impact after the tournament.
Fifa introduced compulsory hydration pauses for all matches staged in the US, Mexico and Canada as a player-welfare measure. The breaks were scheduled regardless of local conditions and lasted three minutes.
Supporters began booing the stoppages as the tournament progressed, expressing frustration at interruptions. Broadcasters and experts noted the commercial value of extra breaks, with reports that a 30-second World Cup ad slot on Fox Sports in the US cost between $200,000 and $300,000, rising to $750,000 for USA matches and late-stage fixtures.
Coaches used the pauses for tactical instructions during matches, and reactions among football bodies and managers varied: UEFA has ruled out adopting hydration breaks, England manager Thomas Tuchel said they interrupt a match’s identity, while Spain coach Luis de la Fuente defended them as beneficial for player health.
Wenger acknowledged that some viewers disliked the hydration breaks and confirmed Fifa will evaluate their overall effect after the World Cup. He also said the expansion of the tournament to 48 teams was successful and ethically justified, giving more countries a chance to compete.