Light Mode
Dark Mode
System Mode
House approves Sunshine Protection Act to make daylight saving time permanent, shaping national time policy and impacting schedules and commerce.
The US House of Representatives voted 308-117 to approve the Sunshine Protection Act on Tuesday, moving the country toward permanent Daylight Saving Time as currently observed from March through November. Representative Vern Buchanan of Florida introduced the bill in January 2025, and supporters say the change would eliminate the twice-yearly clock shifts that disrupt schedules; an identical Senate companion was introduced by Florida Republican Rick Scott in January 2025.
The measure, which now awaits Senate consideration, would fix clocks to daylight saving time year-round rather than returning to standard time each autumn. Republican Scott DesJarlais presided over the final count and played a clip of The Beatles’ “Here Comes the Sun” during the vote.
Daylight Saving Time (DST) in the US dates back to World War One as a fuel- and energy-saving measure; it was later standardised nationally in 1966. Some states and territories — including Hawaii, Arizona, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands — have long opted out of clock changes.
President Donald Trump has supported ending the clock changes and said in a May social media post that he would work to pass a law to stop the twice-yearly shifts. Proponents argue permanent DST reduces disruptions and administrative costs tied to changing clocks.
Critics counter that permanent DST would produce darker winter mornings, potentially worsening early-morning road safety and disrupting morning light that supports healthy sleep cycles. Public-health advocates who favour standard time point to benefits from brighter mornings for circadian rhythms.
Fixing the nation to permanent DST would shift the balance of daylight toward later afternoons year-round, with potential consumer and economic effects such as longer evening retail hours and altered energy consumption patterns. However, the darker winter mornings could increase risks for commuters and schoolchildren, prompting state or local policy responses where exceptions remain allowed.
Implementation would also require coordination across federal and state authorities and could spur legal and logistical debates about exceptions and cross-border commerce in multi-state regions that currently observe different rules.