Light Mode
Dark Mode
System Mode
Former Autostrade CEO sentenced to 12 years for negligence in the Genoa Morandi Bridge collapse, marking a major accountability ruling.
Giovanni Castellucci, former chief executive of Autostrade per l’Italia (Aspi), has been sentenced to 12 years in prison in the Genoa trial over the Morandi bridge collapse on 14 August 2018, which killed 43 people, court officials announced. The verdict, read by Judge Paolo Lepri, also handed 11 years to Michele Donferri Mitelli and shorter terms to other executives and engineers.
The collapse occurred during a summer rainstorm, sending cars and lorries plummeting from the motorway viaduct designed by Riccardo Morandi in 1967. Prosecutors had sought substantially longer sentences: they asked for a combined 400 years across 57 defendants on charges including manslaughter and failing to maintain the structure.
Castellucci, who is already serving a six-year sentence related to a 2013 road disaster, did not attend the hearing. Paolo Berti, the former deputy at the motorway operator, received five-and-a-half years, while several officials were given terms just under two years and 25 defendants were acquitted or exempted due to statute of limitations.
Among sentenced individuals were engineers from maintenance firm Spea and former officials from the transport ministry and Atlantia, Aspi’s parent company. Spea’s ex-CEO Antonino Galatà received five-and-a-half years and Mauro Coletta, once head of the ministry’s motorway directorate, was given five years.
Families of victims responded to the verdicts with mixed emotions: some described the sentences as acceptable or a step toward accountability, while others called company apologies insincere. Arrigo Giana, current head of Aspi, issued the firm’s first public apology on the eve of the trial, acknowledging that some decisions left “indelible scars.”
The sentencing marks a legal reckoning for Italy’s motorway governance and maintenance culture. For investors and infrastructure managers, the case underscores how prolonged deferred maintenance and contested design liabilities can translate into severe corporate and criminal exposure. Public trust in private concessionaires is likely to remain fragile, prompting closer regulatory scrutiny and potential contractual and financial repercussions for companies operating critical transport assets.
On a societal level, the ruling may strengthen calls for clearer accountability frameworks and more transparent inspection regimes for ageing infrastructure across Europe. Legal outcomes here could influence policy debates about privatization, concession oversight and the allocation of civil versus criminal responsibility in infrastructure failures.